An interview with Christine Dwyer Hickey/b>
|
 |
In March 2004 the Femmes read Tatty by Christine Dwyer Hickey, it was an instant favourite with all of us and moved straight into our Bibliofemme Top 5. This week Christine kindly took some time out to answer questions posed by our DJ and also by some members of our discussion boards.
Was it difficult to write this book?
Yes and no. No because it was really just a question of
getting into child's head and staying there and yes because
the subject matter was difficult to handle
How much of yourself and your own experiences are in Tatty?
Quite a bit to be honest. The locations are my childhood
locations - schools etc, house and so forth - and I certainly
know what it's like to live within that family environment.
For the sake of the novel a lot was added and subtracted and
some of the experiences were borrowed from friends or
simply made up.
If so, would you say that writing it was a cathartic experience?
It was. Eventually. I understand more now about the
long-term effects of alcoholism and how it leaks down
through the generations and understanding has helped to make
me feel slightly liberated
In what way does Tatty differ from your previous work?
For a start it's written from the point of view of only
one person whereas my other work had always given several
points of view. My novels tend to be very character driven
and I quite like the freedom and variety that allows.
(Somebody told me I make Dickens look like a one-man band!)
So suddenly I only had one perspective to work with and a
much narrow location. The other books move from a detailed
Dublin City to Belfast with occasional side trips to London,
New York and India. Tatty doesn't get much further than the
suburbs, so is a smaller canvas by far.
How hard is it to move away from a longer project like a trilogy to
a single book like Tatty?
Not exactly hard, just different for the reasons stated
above. Also Tatty sees the world through a child's eyes and
children generally only take account of their immediate
surroundings. In other words everything had to be relevant
and there could be no wandering off on all those lovely
tangents that help to pad out the novel.
Do you think Tatty represents a bygone Ireland or is it just as
relevant to today's society?
As long as drink remains a problem, then Tatty's story is relevant.
Do you write short stories?
I started off writing short stories and I think that's
the way to go as a writer. A short story needs to be tighter
than a novel and learning to control it is excellent
training. It's also a very good way to handle an excess of
ideas in that they can be spread over a few stories instead
of overloading the one novel. I won the short story
competition in Listowel Writers Week twice, and another one
in The Observer/Penguin competition. This gave me the
confidence to try my first novel. I'm hoping to get back to
the short story form in the near future.
Why did you become a writer?
There are many other things I would prefer to do but I
writing is what I do best (that's not a boast by the way!) I
don't really know why, I only know it was something inside
me since childhood. And now it's too late to do anything
else - a disease with no cure, if you like.
What's the best piece of advice you've been given as a writer?
Rewrite, rewrite and rewrite. Then do it all over again. And
this is advice I've given to myself but I happen to think
it's the best advice.
How does the writing process work for you - do you write very day
regardless or work in blocks on specific projects?
It varies. When I've finished I take a little break then
bit by bit I have to coax myself into starting something
new. A half an hour a day which over a week or two
increases by another half an hour until I'm up to four
hours. And that's more than enough, anything after that is
punishment for the writer and the writing. The mind also
needs space and time to continue the process away from the
keyboard. This is when ideas start to take shape, voices
start talking, plots unfurl when we least expect it,
walking the dog or washing the dishes.
What was the last good book you read?
The book I'm reading at the moment, Shade by Neil Jordan.
It's wonderfully moody, and without mood a novel is
nothing. I think Jordan is a very underrated writer and so
far Shade is more than living up to my expectations.
Shadow: "I read somewhere that this book is about growing up in
an alcoholic family I'd be interested to know if the story is based on a
true life experience?"
Yes. I come from the background of the alcoholic family,
so I know exactly what it's like to be a child in that
environment.
Germinal: "I just wanted to ask what writers have influenced you or
which ones do you admire the most?"
I love writers that are visual, books you see as you
read. Peter Carey, Neil Jordan, Graham Swift, William
Trevor. Carey is probably my favourite because he always
tries something different, creating an entirely new world
each time. For use of language you can't beat Joyce and I
greatly admire Virginia Wolfe for the same reason. Sharp
observers and deft prose-handlers attract me too, like
Martin Amis or Evelyn Waugh. Sometimes a writer will give
you one perfect book - Michael Ondaatje's The English
Patient - others like Cary are consistently good. Novels
about India, novels about China, the list is endless but
these are the ones that immediately spring to mind.
The Artist: "We have a bit of a discussion going on in here about
celebrity book clubs. How would you feel if Tatty was endorsed by
Richard and Judy/Oprah or the likes?"
Over the moon and back again.
Mary C: "I would like to know why the author ended the story where she
did."
Instinct told me it was time to sign off. I also wanted
to leave the story with an air of inevitability. There could
be no resolution, because there rarely is in such
situations.
Lisa: "I just wanted to ask if Christine thinks that there is too
much so called chick lit/beach books coming out of Ireland from women
writers and not enough serious books (literature etc)."
All books are fine as long as they're well written. I do
regret this definite division that seems to be foregone
conclusion these days ie a book either has to be fluff and
nonsense or else something so dense it has to be dredged
through. Why can't literary books be accessible and why
can't some (and I stress some) beach books stop insulting
the intelligence of their readers? No matter what side of
the fence you're on a book should give pleasure or at least
make us think!
To read our review of Tatty click here
To read an extract from Tatty click here
To view our online discussion about this book or to add your comments click here
The Femmes would like to extend a special thank you to Joe from New Island for all his help and support, and of course to Christine Dwyer Hickey for taking the time to talk to us.